Last updated: 2024-01-01
Checks: 2 0
Knit directory:
mage_2020_marker-gene-benchmarking/
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.7.0). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.
The results in this page were generated with repository version 2c5ed16. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for
the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results
(you can use wflow_publish
or
wflow_git_commit
). workflowr only checks the R Markdown
file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it
depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results
were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: .Renviron
Ignored: .Rhistory
Ignored: .Rproj.user/
Ignored: .snakemake/
Ignored: NSForest/.Rhistory
Ignored: NSForest/NS-Forest_v3_Extended_Binary_Markers_Supplmental.csv
Ignored: NSForest/NS-Forest_v3_Full_Results.csv
Ignored: NSForest/NSForest3_medianValues.csv
Ignored: NSForest/NSForest_v3_Final_Result.csv
Ignored: NSForest/__pycache__/
Ignored: NSForest/data/
Ignored: RankCorr/picturedRocks/__pycache__/
Ignored: benchmarks/
Ignored: config/
Ignored: data/cellmarker/
Ignored: data/downloaded_data/
Ignored: data/expert_annotations/
Ignored: data/expert_mgs/
Ignored: data/raw_data/
Ignored: data/real_data/
Ignored: data/sim_data/
Ignored: data/sim_mgs/
Ignored: data/special_real_data/
Ignored: figures/
Ignored: logs/
Ignored: results/
Ignored: weights/
Unstaged changes:
Modified: smash-fork
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were
made to the R Markdown (analysis/index.Rmd
) and HTML
(public/index.html
) files. If you’ve configured a remote
Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote
), click on the
hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that
past version.
File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rmd | 2c5ed16 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2024-01-01 | Tweak website |
html | c7df94e | Jeffrey Pullin | 2024-01-01 | Build site. |
html | fcecf65 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-09-09 | Build site. |
html | af96b34 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-08-30 | Build site. |
html | 72ff781 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-05-11 | Build site. |
Rmd | f0da1ad | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-05-11 | Update landing page |
html | 0e47874 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-05-04 | Build site. |
html | b5045c1 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-05-02 | Build site. |
Rmd | 048156f | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-05-02 | Tweak analysis outputs |
html | 048156f | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-05-02 | Tweak analysis outputs |
html | 8b989e1 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-05-02 | Build site. |
html | 0548273 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-05-02 | Build site. |
Rmd | 50bca7c | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-05-02 | workflowr::wflow_publish(all = TRUE, republish = TRUE) |
html | 50bca7c | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-05-02 | workflowr::wflow_publish(all = TRUE, republish = TRUE) |
html | 5cc008f | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-02-09 | Build site. |
Rmd | d1aca16 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-02-09 | Refresh website |
html | d1aca16 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2022-02-09 | Refresh website |
html | a116967 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2021-04-13 | Build site. |
Rmd | 581627b | Jeffrey Pullin | 2021-04-13 | Rebuild index |
html | ca82ce0 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2021-02-16 | Build site. |
Rmd | 63bce66 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2021-02-16 | Add new marker gene type analysis and update FDR + TPR |
html | 2863555 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2021-02-10 | Build site. |
Rmd | 1ad9d6d | Jeffrey Pullin | 2021-02-10 | Add workflowr website |
Rmd | 7971ea2 | Jeffrey Pullin | 2020-10-25 | Initial commit |
This project aim to benchmark current methods for the selection of cell-type maker genes in scRNA-seq data. Our findings are summarized in the following preprint:
A comparison of marker gene selection methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data
Jeffrey M Pullin, Davis J McCarthy
bioRxiv 2022.05.09.490241; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.09.490241
We assessed the method’s concordance, the characteristics of the marker genes they select, and the magnitude and surprising properties of the p-values they return.
Next, we assessed the method’s performance on simulated data and their predictive performance on real datasets.
We compared the method’s ability to select expert annotated marker genes on a vareity of datasets:
We assessed the impact of various dataset characteritics on methods performance and method’s stability when an exemplar real dataset was down-sampled.
We assessed the methods’ speed and memory usage as well as the quality of their implementations.
Finally, we compared the commonly used Scanpy and Seurat packages, examining the impact of their different methods for calculating log fold-change.
A number of additional, supporting analyses were performed:
A variety of scRNA-seq datasets are used in the used to compare
methods. For theses datasets we have performed general analysis,
including selecting marker genes. The code used to process the each
dataset can be found in the corresponding prep_*
R script
in the code
directory. A selection of datasets (below) were
partially analysed to inform aspects of the benchmarking.